|
|||||||||||||
The Battle of Qarqar (853 BCE) |
|||||||||||||
![]() The Kurkh Stela (British Museum, London) |
Battle
of Qarqar: one
of the fights during the Assyrian
king Šalmaneser III's
campaign
against the city states of Syria. The main source is the Kurkh Stela,
which has become famous because it mentions king Ahab of Israel.
PreludeThe Assyrian king Šalmaneser III was a remarkable warrior, who often fought against the city states in the west. In 857, he reached the Amanus Mountains and the Mediterranean shores, and in the next year, he settled Assyrians in this land. Far from stabilizing the region, it led to an escalation. The remaining city states and kingdoms in the west united in a defensive alliance, and seem to have tried to create dissension within the Assyrian realms. We are not certain about this, but the Kurkh Stela, our main source for Šalmaneser's western campaigns, refers to a rebel named Giammu in the valley of the river Balik. However this may be, Šalmaneser sought a decisive battle to show who was the boss. He departed from Nineveh after the full month of the month Ajaru had been observed, as was customary, in the year in which Dayan-Aššur was limmu; comparison to the Assyrian Eponym List helps to establish that this was the spring of 853. The army marched to the west and encountered the first resistance in the valley of the river Balik, where Giammu had seized power. At Karchemiš, which was by now called Kar-Šalmaneser, the Assyrian army crossed the Euphrates. At Pitru, the king received envoys from Melidu (Melitene), Gurgum, Kummuhi (Commagene), Karchemiš, and Arpad, who stressed their loyalty. More importantly, there were also representatives of the recently conquered territories in the west, Sam'al and Pattina. |
![]() |
|||||||||||
![]() Statue of Šalmaneser III from Aššur (Arkeoloji Müzesi, Istanbul) |
I approached the cities of [king] Irhuleni, the Hamathite. I captured Adennu, Parga, and Argana, his royal cities. I carried off captives, his valuables, and his palace possessions. I set fire to his palaces. The army continued to the Qarqar (satellite photo), a town on the Orontes. If Hamath had been the aim of Šalmaneser's invasion, this is illogical, and we may assume that the king had another reason to go in this direction: because he knew that the army of his enemies was - or would be arriving - here. This makes sense. One of the newly conquered territories, Pattina, was on the lower Orontes, and it would be logical for the coalition to try to liberate this state: after all, the inhabitants had fresh memories of Assyrian conquest, and might easily support the allies. If this was indeed the operational aim of the coalition, it is logical to find them in the valley of the Orontes.The coalitionIn the Kurkh stela, Šalmaneser enumerates his opponents:I razed, destroyed,
and burned the city of Qarqar, the royal city.
These twelve kings
he took as allies. They marched against me to do war and battle.
|
||||||||||||
![]() The plain of the Orontes, seen from the Bargylus Mountains; the battlefield is in the distance. |
These lines are not unproblematic, if only because only eleven divisions are named. A possible solution is to assume that the final item is in fact a reference to two states: Ba'asa may have been king of Ammon and Beth-Rehob, although these two territories were separated by Damascus. Another solution is to assume that Qarqar, which had already been destroyed and could no longer fight, was the twelfth member of the league. However, it probably was not an independent state (the Antakya Stela proves that Hamath controlled large parts of the Orontes valley). The most likely solution is that the number twelve is just symbolic, BattleŠalmaneser describes the fight in highly stereotypical phrases:With the supreme
forces which Aššur, my lord, had given me and
with the mighty weapons which the divine standard, which goes
before me, had granted me, I fought with them. I decisively defeated
them from the city of Qarqar to the city of Gilzau. I felt with the
sword 14,000 troops, their fighting men. Like Adad, I rained down upon
them a devastating flood. I spread out their corpses and I filled the
plain. I felled with the sword their extensive troops. I made their
blood flow in the wadis. The field was too small for laying flat their
bodies; the broad countryside had been consumed in burying them. I
blocked the Orontes river with their corpses as with a causeway. In the
midst of the battle I took away from them chariots, cavalry, and teams
of horses.
At this point, the account on the Kurkh Stela breaks off. This, and the
great number of spelling errors, suggest that the stela had to be
erected quickly. It had to be made clear to anyone who might have
thought otherwise, that the king had achieved a splendid victory.AftermathReality may have been different. It seems that the battle of Qarqar had not been decisive, because we read about continuous warfare. Ten years later, Šalmaneser for the third time ordered the composition of his Annals ("Recension C"). The story of the campaign of 853 is summarized - the number of killed enemies is now 25,000 men - and we learn that the king boarded ships and went out upon the sea. But we also read that in 849, Šalmaneser had to fight against Karchemiš and Arpad, which had been loyal in 853, and against the coalition. Next year, the Assyrians again had to fight against Karchemiš, Arpad, and Hamath; a third battle against the coalition forces ended in the inevitable Assyrian victory. Whatever the nature of Assyria's victories, the fact that he king needed to return proves that Qarqar, whoever may have been the tactical victor, had been a strategic victory for the coalition, which was able to expand its power to Karchemiš and Arpad. |
||||||||||||
King Jehu of Israel doing homage to Šalmaneser (British Museum) |
Recension C ends with another battle, in 845. This time, the coalition received no support from Arpad and Karchemiš, and it seems that this time, victory was decisive: the two states never returned to the coalition. "Recension D" of Šalmaneser's Annals, which is inscribed on two monumental bulls found in Nimrud, refers to another campaign, in 841. This time, the Assyrians seem to have met an isolated king Hazael of Damascus, because the coalition is not mentioned. They defeated him in battle, marched to Damascus, pillaged the land, and received tribute from Sidon, Tyre, and Israel. This was repeated three years later, although this time, the tribute bearers were Sidon, Tyre, and Byblos. The coalition had been broken, and Assyrian power in Syria was to last for two centuries. Qarqar had not been decisive, but in retrospect, it had been the beginning of the end for independent Syria. In 833, Šalmaneser ordered his statue to be erected near one of the gates of Aššur (above). The inscription records operations in all parts of the known world, but from the western front, it mentions two campaigns only: Qarqar and the first attack on Damascus. |
©
Jona Lendering for Livius.Org, 2009 Revision: 30 August 2009 |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||